首页 > 范文大全 > 正文

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补与开放性腹股沟疝修补的疗效对比

开篇:润墨网以专业的文秘视角,为您筛选了一篇腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补与开放性腹股沟疝修补的疗效对比范文,如需获取更多写作素材,在线客服老师一对一协助。欢迎您的阅读与分享!

【摘要】 目的 研究腹腔R腹股沟疝修补术和开放性腹股沟修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床治疗效果。方法 62例腹沟股疝患者作为研究对象, 根据治疗方法不同分为观察组与对照组, 每组31例。观察组采用腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)治疗, 对照组采用开放性腹股沟疝修补术治疗, 对两组患者的手术时间、住院时间, 以及术后复发、疼痛、感染等不良事件的发生情况进行观察并比较。结果 采用腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗的观察组患者手术时间为(78.1±11.6)min, 显著高于对照组的(63.6±8.7)min, 但观察组患者住院时间为(6.4±2.2)d, 明显短于对照组的(8.2±2.6)d, 两组比较差异均具有统计学意义(P

【关键词】 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术;开发性腹股沟疝修补术;腹股沟疝;疗效

DOI:10.14163/ki.11-5547/r.2016.32.030

【Abstract】 Objective To research clinical effects by laparascopic inguinal hernia repair and developmental inguinal hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods A total of 62 patients with inguinal hernia as study subjects were divided by different treatment measures into observation group and control group, with 31 cases in each group. The observation group received laparascopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) for treatment, and the control group received open inguinal hernia repair instead. Observation and comparison was made on operation time, hospital stay time, and incidences of postoperative recurrence, pain, infection as adverse reactions between the two groups. Results Observation group had operation time as (78.1±11.6) min, which was much longer than (63.6±8.7) min in the control group, while its hospital stay time was obviously shorter as (6.4±2.2) d than (8.2±2.6) d in the control group. Their differences all had statistical significance (P

[4] 卢晓裕, 魏文波, 江树嵩, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的疗效比较. 微创医学, 2015, 10(3):383-384.

[5] 巴桑卓嘎, 仁真尼布, 曹宏伟, 等. 2例经腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP). 医药, 2016(2):92-93.

[6] 戴继平. 腹腔镜手术治疗老年腹股沟疝患者的疗效及优势. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(3):116-117.

[7] 施景, 陈海生, 褚中华. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补与开放性腹股沟疝修补的疗效对比研究. 岭南现代临床外科, 2014, 18(2): 176-178.

[8] 景恩义, 刘雅莉, 杨克虎, 等. 腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝疗效的系统评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2010, 10(7):875-881.

[9] 严聪. 腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床对比. 中外医学研究, 2013(18):113.

[10] 岩炳. 腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床对比. 中国卫生产业, 2013(19):111.

[11] 张朋, 牛兆健, 屈彬, 等. 探讨腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效. 吉林医学, 2014(19): 4203-4204.

[12] 汪江, 龚建云, 邱学辉, 等. 腹腔镜疝修补手术与开放式无张力疝修补手术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效观察. 中外医学研究, 2014(5):27-28.

[13] 蒋邦好, 梁伟雄, 谢志荣. 腹腔镜疝修补术与开放性无张力疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的对比分析. 中国实用医药, 2012, 7(17):9-10.

[14] 孟兴成, 吴志明, 储修峰. 局麻下开放性腹膜前修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝. 中国微创外科杂志, 2014(4):370-371.

[15] 刘智毅. 开放性前入路腹膜前间隙无张力修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效. 临床合理用药杂志, 2015(27):127-128.

[16] 潘宏刚, 刘明. 老年腹股沟疝通过开放性与腹腔镜无张力疝修补术治疗的效果观察. 养生保健指南(医药研究), 2016(5):194.

[17] 燕涛, 侯亚峰, 程晓剑, 等. 手术入路选择对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术临床疗效及安全性的影响. 安徽医药, 2015, 11(8):1348-1350.

[18] 赵健, 郭天康. 腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝疗效Meta分析. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015(1):86-93.

[19] 依马木・阿比汗, 买买吐尔孙・吐尔迪, 吴源泉, 等. 腹腔镜与开放性手术治疗儿童腹股沟疝的对比分析. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 11(4):58-59.

[收稿日期:2016-8-16]