首页 > 范文大全 > 正文

不同方法治疗难治性胃食管反流病的疗效观察

开篇:润墨网以专业的文秘视角,为您筛选了一篇不同方法治疗难治性胃食管反流病的疗效观察范文,如需获取更多写作素材,在线客服老师一对一协助。欢迎您的阅读与分享!

【摘要】 目的 探讨不同方法治疗难治性胃食管反流病的临床疗效和安全性。方法 120例难治性胃食管反流病患者, 随机分为A组和B组, 每组60例。A组患者接受埃索美拉唑 + 莫沙必利治疗, B组患者接受埃索美拉唑 + 莫沙必利 + 铝碳酸镁治疗, 均持续治疗8周。对比分析两组患者的临床症状改善情况、临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果 治疗8周后, 两组患者烧心、反酸、胸骨后疼痛、嗳气的临床症状评分均低于治疗前, 且B组低于A组, 差异有统计学意义(P

【关键词】 难治性胃食管反流病;埃索美拉唑; 莫沙必利; 铝碳酸镁;疗效

DOI:10.14163/ki.11-5547/r.2017.07.002

Curative effect observation on different methods in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease XU Bo-xing, LI Jia. Department of Gastroenterology, Gaozhou City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Maoming 525200, China

【Abstract】 Objective To explore the clinical curative effect and safety of different methods in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Methods A total of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease patients were randomly divided into group A and group B, with 60 cases in each group. Group A received esomeprazole + mosapride for treatment, group B received esomeprazole + mosapride + hydrotalcite for treatment. Both groups all received continuous treatment for 8 weeks. Comparison and analysis on clinical symptom improvement, clinical curative effect and occurrence of adverse reactions in two groups. Results After 8 weeks of treatment, both groups had lower clinical symptom score of heartburn, sour regurgitation, retrosternal pain, belching than before treatment, and group B had lower points than group A, and the difference had statistical significance (P

铝碳酸镁为新型抗酸药, 具有中和胃酸和保护胃黏膜等作用, 此外, 铝碳酸镁的主要活性成分氢氧化镁铝能够吸附和结合胃蛋白酶而直接抑制其活性, 有利于溃疡面的修复, 也是治疗胃食管反流病的有效药物之一[15]。在本次研究结果中, B组患者显效26例, 有效27例, 无效7例, 总有效率为88.33%, A组显效14例, 有效28例, 无效18例, 总有效率为70.00%;两组总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P

综合所述, 埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利和铝碳酸镁治疗难治性胃食管反流病的疗效显著, 能够明显改善患者的临床症状, 且安全性较高, 在临床治疗难治性胃食管反流病时可考虑应用。

参考文献

[1] Boeckxstaens GE, Rohof WO. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, 2014, 43(1):15-25.

[2] 王高峰, 朱生. 难治性胃食管反流病的诊断及治疗进展. 实用医学杂志, 2011, 27(9):1517-1520.

[3] 张晓, 刘海峰, 王伟岸. 质子泵抑制药难治的胃食管反流病的流行病学特征. 武警医学, 2015, 26(4):376-378.

[4] 贾正我, 沈金根, 孙元龙, 等. 雷贝拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗难治性胃食管反流病疗效分析. 医学信息, 2015, 10(18):46.

[5] 王海郁, 王金龙, 赵伟, 等. 两种质子泵抑制剂分别联合莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎的临床疗效比较. 临床合理用药杂志, 2014, 7(13):218-220.

[6] 罗金燕, 牛春燕. 难治性胃食管反流病诊治进展. 中国实用内科杂志, 2010, 19(1):90-92.

[7] 聂颖, 古赛. 难治性反流性食管炎相关危险因素分析. 重庆医科大学学报, 2014, 20(12):1813-1816.

[8] 李思愉, 世耀 , 高虹. 难治性胃食管反流病的反流危险因素调查. 中国临床医学, 2013, 20(5):696-698.

[9] Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, 108(3):308-328.

[10] 王淑君, 钱家鸣. 关注质子泵抑制剂长期治疗的不良反应. 药物不良反应杂志, 2015, 17(1):1-2.

[11] 杨凡, 龚瑞雪. 埃索美拉唑联合枸橼酸莫沙必利对哮喘合并胃食管反流患者肺功能的影响. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(13):155-156.

[12] 王宏建, 徐会娟. 联合应用莫沙必利、铝碳酸镁和泮托拉唑治疗胆汁反流性胃炎(BRG)的临床疗效. 中国实用医药, 2014, 9(12):173-174.

[13] 程春艳. 莫沙必利联合埃索美拉唑治疗胃食管反流病的临床效果. 中国当代医药, 2014, 21(4):50-51.

[14] 王自启. 埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗胃食管反流病的临床疗效观察. 临床合理用药杂志, 2014, 7(25):34-35.

[15] Mauritz FA, Rinsma NF, Conchillo JM, et al. Su1949 Esophageal Mucosal Integrity Recovers After Laparoscopic Fundoplication in Children With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology, 2014, 146(5):506.

[收稿日期:2017-01-10]