首页 > 范文大全 > 正文

基于产品低碳责任的供应链风险与竞争分析

开篇:润墨网以专业的文秘视角,为您筛选了一篇基于产品低碳责任的供应链风险与竞争分析范文,如需获取更多写作素材,在线客服老师一对一协助。欢迎您的阅读与分享!

基于产品低碳责任供应链风险竞争分析

摘要:从低碳经济背景下的产品低碳责任出发,运用博弈论的基本思想,对低碳经济下供应链的风险规避与竞争进行了分析。结果表明:制造商履行产品低碳责任水平不受决策参与者风险规避度的影响,产品均衡价格和分销商的期望收益均是分销商风险规避度的减函数,这将导致市场消费者对产品需求的增加,从而提升制造商的期望收益;与非竞争相比较,竞争将会降低产品的定价,但同时也会降低供应链履行产品低碳责任的水平,供应链通过横向合作解决非零和博弈造成的价格竞争和产品低碳责任方面的“囚徒困境”问题是实现整个系统利益优化的关键。

关键词:低碳经济;供应链;产品低碳责任;风险规避;竞争

中图分类号:F406.2文献标识码:A文章编号:1001—8409(2012)09—0030—04

Analysis of Risk Aversion and Competition in Supply

Chain Based on Product′s Low—carbon Responsibility

MENG Jionga, GUO Chun—xiab

(a. School of Economic Management, b. School of Foreign Languages & Cultures,Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010)

Abstract: Starting from product′s low—carbon responsibility under the background of low—carbon economy, applying the basic idea of game theory, the essay studies on risk aversion and competition based on low—carbon economy. The results show that: decision—making participant′s risk aversion degrees does not influence the level of the manufacturer performance of product′s low—carbon responsibility, and product equilibrium price and expected revenue of retailer are a decreasing function of retailer′s risk aversion degree, which will lead to increase of product demand of consumer in market, so as to enhance the manufacturer′s expected revenue; the competition would not only reduce product pricing, but also reduce the performance of product low—carbon responsibility of supply chain. It is a key factor of realizing the optimization of the whole system interests that the supply chain solving the “prisoner′s dilemma” problem of price competition and product′s low—carbon responsibility by means of transverse cooperation.

Key words: low—carbon economy; supply chain; product′s low—carbon responsibility; risk aversion; competition

1引言

按照传统的决策思想,企业决策的唯一标准是利润业绩最优化,而很少考虑产品低碳责任。然而,从《联合国气候变化框架公约》到《京都议定书》,再到《哥本哈根协议》,使得低碳经济背景下的产品低碳责任问题成为学术界研究的热点。

Carroll[1,2]认为在CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility)基本框架包括自愿决定的慈善责任、伦理责任、法律责任和经济责任。在Carroll的研究基础上,Jennings等[3]认为CSR还应包括环境、人权和安全。因此,低碳经济下的产品低碳责任(指控制人为温室气体排放所引起的全球变暖问题,以免人类健康受到危害)在概念属性上应从属于CSR。Amaeshi等[4]指出Nike、Adidas 和McDonalds等知名企业已经面临强烈的CSR压力;Pederse等[5]指出为使商业合作伙伴履行社会责任,许多供应链的原始

厂商开始制定行为规则;Hsueh[6]发现供应链履行社会责任时总利润会增加;在假设市场需求确定的前提下,孟炯等[7~9]从CSR的一个方面——产品安全责任入手,对消费者驱动的制销供应链产品安全责任进行了研究。研究显示:制销供应链联盟较好地履行产品安全责任,能够改善供应链的整体绩效。

综上所述,文献[1]~[3]对CSR的分类及内涵进行了研究,文献[4]~[6]对企业(供应链)履行社会责任的研究现状进行了回顾,文献[7]~[9]对消费者驱动的制销供应链产品安全责任进行了研究。上述文献研究表明:产品低碳责任属于CSR的一个方面;企业(供应链)履行CSR将增加收益;供应链较好地履行产品安全责任,能够改善供应链的整体绩效。本文将从CSR的另一个方面——产品低碳责任入手,对低碳经济下供应链的风险规避与竞争进行分析。