肖志军事件的法学追询
开篇：润墨网以专业的文秘视角，为您筛选了一篇肖志军事件的法学追询范文，如需获取更多写作素材，在线客服老师一对一协助。欢迎您的阅读与分享！
摘 要：多数学者认为肖志军拒签事件属于极端个案，不能说明法制不健全。其实，该案反映出我们的制度设计存在严重的问题，其要害在于公法规则在医患双方关系中不适当地设定了患者家属的主体地位与决定权。这种规定在理论上造成逻辑悖谬，在实践中不仅不必要，而且可能造成与立法预期相反的效果。在特定条件之下，取消患者家属的决定权，解除对医院紧急救治行为的强制禁止，则类似问题可迎刃而解。肖志军事件中所出现的问题其实是国家出于政策管制的需要而不适当地介入私法关系所导致的后果，它反映出我国公私法关系理论亟待深入研究。
关键词：肖志军事件；患者家属；决定权；公私法关系
中图分类号：DF2 文献标识码：A
把理由解释为原因，使社会科学陷于帕森斯所说的左右为难的“功利主义困境”，质言之，据此对行动作出的说明，不是空洞的就是错误的。
――詹姆斯•博曼［1］
一、引论：悲剧过后的喧嚷
随着多家律师事务所争相，并且已经正式提起行政复议与行政诉讼，肖志军拒签事件至此已经演化成了肖志军案
[注:拒签致孕妻死亡续：死者父母告北京卫生局不作为［EB/OL］.；男子拒绝手术签字致孕妇死亡［EB/OL］.腾讯网2008年1月10日.
［8］ 张赞宁.丈夫拒绝在手术单上签字致妻儿双亡已构成间接故意杀人罪［EB/OL］..
［9］陈兴良.口授刑法学［M］.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2007：202；533.
［10］许志永.“肖志军悲剧”后的更大悲剧［EB/OL］.北大公法网www.省略/article/Details.asp?NewsId=2140&classid=7&classname=法政时评.
［11］记者.如何防止肖志军式的悲剧？［N］.南方周末，2007-11-30.
［12］苏永钦.民事立法与公私法的接轨［M］.北京：北京大学出版社，2005：20.
［13］盖尤斯：法学阶梯［M］.黄风，译.北京：中国政法大学出版社，1996.
［14］美浓部达吉.公法与私法［M］.黄冯明，译. 北京：中国政法大学出版社，2003.
［15］央行叫停转按揭 商业银行开发新产品抢贷款业务［EB/OL］.news.省略/2007-12-24/1416132. htm
［16］国务院.关于限制生产销售使用塑料购物袋的通知［EB/OL］.中国新闻网，www.省略/ （2008-01-8）.
［17］卡尔•波普.开放社会及其敌人：第2卷［M］.郑一明，等，译. 北京：中国社会科学出版社，1999：159.
A Study of Xiao Zhijun Case from the Perspective of Public and Private Law
WEI Wu1, ZHANG Xiaohui2
(1. Law School, Peking University, Beijing, 100871;
2. Law School , Anhui University Of Finance & Economics, Bengbu 233000, China）
Abstract:
Most scholars in China hold that the Xiao Zhijun Case is an extremely particular one, which is incapable of telling the imperfect of our today’s law system. Nevertheless, this paper maintains that Xiao’s case has demonstrated a severe problem in system design, and the key point consists in that our public law has inappropriately established the patient’s family members as dominant party and possessing a say. Therefore, the present study will present evidence that rules of our law in this perspective bring about logical absurdity in theory, and in practice it is unnecessary and probably results in unexpected effect. Under certain circumstances, this sort of headaches could be resolved completely once the patient’s family members’ decision right and the obligatory prohibition of hospitals for emergent treat are cancelled. In fact, problems in Xiao Zhijun Case are caused by nation’s improper intervention into private law because of the necessity of national policy control, which calls for indepth study of the relationship between our public and private law.
Key Words:Xiao Zhijun case; patient’s family members; decision making right; relationship between public and private law